You might also want to use a way to clearly tell apart files that have been fixed already (move them to another folder, use a dummy tag on files that are not fixed which you delete when they are, etc).Īs someone who went through ~40k tracks at the time, I don't think it was that bad at all as I thought it would be (I didn't type have to type in every single tag by for every single track by hand). Perhaps you'll find that getting rid of the junk let's you focus on and appreciate artists you actually care about more. Then at the end you can decide whether you want to fix the completely messed up ones by hand or you just never cared enough about them to keep them organized at all. Track titles can usually filled using filenames, artist/album names by folder names, etc. You want to look for patterns in your library that are constant across a large number of tracks, run a batch tagging process on them, and repeat this until you are left only with tracks that are completely messed up. How many tracks do you have in your library? It will only get much worse if you neglect it now as your library grows and you still didn't get into the habit of proper organization.įixing your library is painful, yes, but you only have to do it once, not in one sitting, and if you use the tools something like (the audio player) foobar provides, you can leverage a lot of the busywork with the smart use of it. That's why it's so important to start tagging your library and keep it that way (new additions should take minimal effort). If they are a mishmash of randomly tagged/named files, good luck. ![]() Stuff is really easy to find and eliminate if they are properly tagged. Quote from: Moto on 09:28:21 But it appears there absolutely is no way to properly find / delete duplicates without extremely effort. If they make it through, you at least have a way to quickly get rid of them (elimination via merging). Such as not letting anything into your library without going through the tagging process. I'd rather make sure duplicates won't happen in the first place. They require of lot of resources, especially time to produce any results. ![]() I personally had not much of luck with stuff like Similarity. Or are we talking about completely misstagged files that flatout lie about what they are? I'd be more concerned about how did that even happen in the first place. Something like ALBUM - CURRENT DIRECTORY will produce two different hits for the original and copied album while sorting them next to each other so you can notice them. If they are partial matches (but still tagged) the only other thing I can think of is assigning a somewhat unique identifier to the albums (again, in a library viewer with a program such as foobar) and eyeballing through your library. In that case the original would overwrite the duplicate (or the other way around) and you'd end up with only one copy. ![]() If I'm not worried of losing data I would just use a media player like foobar to reorganize these files into one strict pattern based on the tags. ![]() Are these files tagged properly? Are the duplicates always proper duplicates (you can delete whichever without information loss) or more like transcodes/partial matches?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |